The city has a plan in place.  A plan, remarkably, with funding and development approved by all three levels of government, a plan dating from the time of Mayor Ford’s predecessors that he intends to swat away and replace with a half-baked plan of his own.

What?  No, I’m not talking about Transit City.  The Waterfront.  Budget chief Mike Del Grande has as much as said it’s a bold-faced cash grab to patch the gaping hole in Ford’s budget by dumping the waterfront land on the public market.  My earlier piece goes into detail about just what the Fords intend to put on the land (one can almost see them fawning over the architectural drawing “And there’s the big ferris wheel…and the mono rail…and there’s the Burger King - I told ‘em to put that there”), so I won’t go into the ugly details.  

Their big attack to Toronto Waterfront, the board overseeing the development of the land currently and for the last decade, was that the board didn’t have the finances for the plans in place, somewhere around $650 million, nor any way of getting it.  Not so, said Toronto Waterfront, and produced a financing plan developed by them and the Federal and Provincial governments to produce every cent they need by borrowing against future tax revenues and increased land value, the same way dozens of other sites in the world have.  

The waterfront has attracted $1.5 billion in investment, and is entering into a $1 billion deal with the Pan Am Games site developers.  It’s gotten approval and praise from citizens, urban planners and the development industry.  It’s fully financed and well-planned.  It’s backed by both upper levels of our government.  

When will Toronto councillors wake up to the cries of protest from the city around them?

Posted on September 8 2011 with 1 note

The Best Little Whorehouse in the Don Lands

There will be a lineup from here (the Port Lands) to City Hall wanting to invest in this area”

That’s Councillor Doug Ford, brother of Mayor Rob Ford, talking about their grand waterfront plans for Toronto.  To be honest, it sounds like a brazen, neon-filled tribute to the worst parts of Vegas (okay maybe not the worst parts, I don’t know if they’re advocating prostitution and copious drugs…though their not not advocating them, and Team Ford cheerleader Georgio Mammoliti wants a brothel out on the island) right here on our own waterfront. 

Say, isn’t that what they said about the subway extension, that private investors would be chomping at the bit to get a piece of that action?  Though, to be fair a hotel/mega-mall on the shore would likely garner a little more interest than a subway to nowhere I still don’t see it as too likely they’d up and drop a couple billion on Toronto’s waterfront.  

Oh. Also:  monorail.  Yeah that’s right.  Why?  Probably because the Ford’s think they’re cool.  They’ll trash a fully funded multi-billion dollar invest by the federal and provincial governments for transit across the city, but want to build an overly-expensive monorail on the waterfront.  I’m actually a bit surprised the Ford’s didn’t throw in an NFL stadium in their grand scheme for the waterfront.

Never mind that there’s already a body that oversees the development of the region, The Toronto Port Lands Committee (TPLC).  Their plan for the land, which has been in development for the better part of a decade, involves bike trails, hiking paths, light rail transit and plenty of park space.  Sue-Ann Levy, the beacon of journalistic integrity that she is, dismisses this as a “Socialist Utopia” as though that were some sort of dirty word.  The fundamental difference here, in my opinion, is between an area that everyone in the city can go and enjoy, and a place where the well-to-do can go play.  

Their rationale is that their development plan will actually make the city money, where the parks-and-trails plan won’t.  Is that really what it’s come down to?  Do we have to whore some of the nicest real-estate in the city, with unparalleled vistas and aesthetic to make a quick buck for the city’s ailing budget?

Maybe they are trying to bring the best part of Vegas to the waterfront after all.

Posted on August 30 2011 with 1 note

Quote

You’ve gotta start with the customer experience, and move backwards to the technology. You can’t start with the technology, and figure out where you’re gonna sell it. … I know that it is the case.

- Steve Jobs, 1997 WWDC

You can’t just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they’ll want something new.

- Steve Jobs, 2005

Posted on August 19 2011

Quote

We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas.
Steve Jobs (CEO Apple Inc)
PBS Triumph of the Nerds
1996

Posted on August 19 2011 with 2 notes

Link: Apple “demands” all Samsung Galaxy phones and tablets are removed from sale in the EU

Apple sort of comes off as a whiny brat who didn’t get what he wanted for his birthday, so he smashes his friend’s toy, too.

infinityandroid:

Theres been another sensational escalation in the PATENT WAR, with Apple now asking a Dutch court to ban ALL Sa… http://p.ost.im/p/e8J6TM

(Source: )

Posted on August 19 2011 with 2 notes

Quote

Here’s how to install Google’s Android OS on your iPhone. Be forewarned, though: This hack isn’t for the faint of heart.
How to Install Android on Your iPhone

Posted on August 19 2011

Photo

Posted on August 19 2011

Posted Toronto Political Panel: Should Ford slash the city’s workforce?

Goldsbie: On Saturday, you wrote an op-ed concluding that, “Layoffs would be painful for a lot of people. But if the city’s fiscal health requires them, then with appropriate regret, the cutbacks must begin.” This echoes the grief expressed by Rob Ford when he said of cyclists that “My heart bleeds for ‘em when I hear someone gets killed, but it’s their own fault at the end of the day.” While the sympathy in both cases may very well be genuine, both statements speak to the idea that certain casualties are inevitable in a prosperous, modern city; we just have to sort of suck up and deal with them.

Read More

(Source: news.nationalpost.com)

Posted on August 18 2011

Life During Wartime

I wonder if Apple simply enjoys stirring up trouble.  

For the better part of a year, now, Apple Inc. has been in the centre of a whirlwind of lawsuits.  HTC, Samsung, Nokia, Motorola, Kodak and others have all been part of these legal actions, either by or against Apple.  In quite a lot of those cases, Apple instigated the legal battles.  It’s entirely likely there’s a showdown between Apple and internet behemoth Google on the horizon, too.  

You know, I don’t entirely blame them.  They have a lot of competition in the media player, smartphone, tablet and desktop PC markets.  And it’s not like they try to deter this kind of activity.  Apple makes a pretty obvious stance of being the single most popular phone and tablet model in the market, and having a massive fuckload of cash.  They cast off this undeniable air of arrogance in their market dealings, as though their untouchable.  

Read More

Posted on August 18 2011 with 10 notes

Highlights of the Core Service Review Deputations

undergrievances wrote:

So, I decided to attend part of the “slumber party” at City Hall last night to watch the deputations before the Mayor’s executive committee on the core service review. I was only there for about 2.5 hours (props to those who stayed all day and night), but what I saw was absolutely amazing. I could not have been more inspired by my fellow Torontonians’ show of support and love for this wonderful city.

Read More

Posted on August 18 2011 with 1 note


Tumblr theme designed by The City Loop.